Select Page

The Gospel of Thomas and the Evolution of the Christian Canon

by | Mar 25, 2024 | Uncategorized

In the vast milieu of early Christian texts, there lies a contentious gem: The Gospel of Thomas. An enigmatic collection steeped in paradox and metaphor; it opens an intriguing path offering an alternative perspective on canonical Christianity. This compelling gospel doesn’t tell us stories or parables as we’re accustomed to, but enlightens us with mysterious ‘sayings’ of Jesus. Straddling the line between orthodoxy and heresy, its discovery in the mid-20th century ignited intense debates about its authenticity, origins, and the very nature of the Christian canon itself. As we delve into this mystical text and unravel how it has sparked significant shifts in Biblical scholarship, brace yourself for a riveting journey into the mystical realms of early Christianity that can potentially revolutionize our understanding of spiritual thought and expression. Hold on tight; this is not your Sunday school’s version of Bible study.

The Gospel of Thomas is not included in the Bible because its authorship, readership, and theological perspective were debated by early Christian scholars. Ultimately, it was excluded from the canon of works chosen for inclusion in the official Bible at the Council of Rome in 382 AD. However, studying the Gospel of Thomas can provide academic insight into the ideas circulating during the early formation of the church and its relevance to theological movements that emerged after Jesus’ earthly life.

Why Gospel of Thomas Not in Bible

Reasons for Exclusion from the Bible

The process of forming the Christian canon, including determining which texts should be included in the Bible, was a complex and multifaceted one. When it comes to the exclusion of certain texts, such as the Gospel of Thomas, there were several reasons taken into consideration.

One significant reason for the Gospel of Thomas being excluded from the Bible is its origin among a group known as “gnostics.” These individuals sought to reconcile philosophical principles with teachings about Jesus, which often deviated from mainstream Christianity. As a result, their interpretation of Jesus’ teachings and their understanding of his authority differed from those upheld by orthodox Christian groups.

Reasons for Exclusion from the Bible
Unorthodox Teachings
Discrepant Literary Form

Now that we understand one reason why certain texts like the Gospel of Thomas were excluded from the Bible, let’s delve into another crucial factor: unorthodox teachings.

  • The climate of controversy around the Gospel of Thomas escalated in 382 AD during the Council of Rome, when various scriptural texts were examined for canonical inclusion. Out of numerous circulating religious texts, only 73 books were officially incorporated into the canon.
  • Despite repeated rejections by leading early church figures such as Bishop Eusebius and Origen of Alexandria, who considered it heretical or unorthodox, the Gospel of Thomas’s sayings exhibit significant overlap with canonical gospels, with two-thirds to 80% similarity.
  • While the Gospel of Thomas might not offer direct insights into Jesus’ life, it provides academic understandings into theological movements following his existence. It is believed that this gospel originated from a group known as “gnostics”, constituting a distinct belief system seeking to reconcile teachings about Jesus with philosophical concepts prevalent between 100 and 200 AD.

Unorthodox Teachings

One primary concern with the Gospel of Thomas was its content, which presented teachings considered unorthodox by early Christian communities. While some sayings in the Gospel of Thomas resemble those found in the canonical gospels, others are considered strange and obscure, not aligning with established theological beliefs.

For instance, in saying 114 of the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus speaks about a woman being transformed into a man to enter the kingdom of heaven. This concept diverges from traditional Christian doctrine and raises questions regarding its authenticity and compatibility with mainstream beliefs.

As early Christian communities sought to establish a cohesive theology and authoritative religious texts, they carefully evaluated various writings based on their consistency with established teachings and beliefs. The inclusion or exclusion of certain texts hinged on their alignment with early Christian orthodoxy.

To put it simply, think of it like a puzzle. The early Christians were assembling the pieces of their faith, seeking texts that fit together harmoniously to create a coherent picture of their beliefs.

Having explored the reasons for the exclusion of texts like the Gospel of Thomas from the Bible and touched upon the unorthodox teachings found in it, we can now move forward to explore more aspects related to its exclusion and subsequent impact.

  • The Gospel of Thomas, while containing some sayings similar to those in the canonical gospels, diverges from traditional Christian doctrine with teachings that were considered unorthodox by early Christian communities. This raised questions about its authenticity and compatibility with mainstream beliefs. Early Christians carefully evaluated various writings based on their consistency with established teachings, seeking texts that fit together cohesively to create a coherent picture of their beliefs. The exclusion of certain texts, such as the Gospel of Thomas, from the Bible was primarily driven by their divergence from early Christian orthodoxy. Understanding the reasons for these exclusions can shed light on the formation and development of early Christianity.

Discrepant Literary Form

One of the striking aspects of the Gospel of Thomas is its discrepant literary form when compared to the four canonical Gospels included in the New Testament. While Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John present a narrative account of Jesus’ life, teachings, death, and resurrection, the Gospel of Thomas consists solely of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus. It lacks a cohesive narrative structure, making it distinct from the traditional biographical style found in the canonical Gospels. This unique format raises questions about the purpose and intended audience of Thomas’s Gospel.

Discovery and Analysis of Thomas’s Gospel

The discovery of the Gospel of Thomas in 1945 was a groundbreaking moment for biblical scholarship. Found among a collection of ancient texts known as the Nag Hammadi library in Egypt, this gospel provided new insights into early Christian thought and theology. Scholars believe that the Gospel of Thomas circulated between the years 150 and 350 AD but its original composition likely dates back even earlier.

The analysis of Thomas’s Gospel has been a subject of much debate among scholars. Some quotations in this gospel resemble words found in the biblical Gospels, while others are considered strange and obscure. The majority of New Testament scholars do not consider the Gospel of Thomas to offer new or unique insights into the historical Jesus of Nazareth. Instead, it is seen as more informative about theological movements that emerged after Jesus’ earthly life.

Additionally, there is ongoing discussion regarding the authorship and readership of the Gospel of Thomas. There is no consensus on who wrote it or how widely it was read in the ancient world. However, its inclusion in the Nag Hammadi library alongside other Gnostic texts suggests that it may have originated from a group known as “gnostics,” who sought to reconcile teachings about Jesus with popular philosophical principles between 100 and 200 AD.

While the Gospel of Thomas was not accepted into the official canon of the Christian Bible, it is worth studying academically to gain a deeper understanding of the ideas circulating and those kept and rejected during the early formation of the church.

Influence on Early Church Doctrine

The Gospel of Thomas holds a significant place in the study of early Christianity. While not included in the official canon, this collection of sayings attributed to Jesus influenced the theological debates and discussions within the early church. The inclusion of unique teachings and perspectives challenged prevailing interpretations and provided alternative viewpoints on Christian doctrine. Scholars analyze its impact on various aspects of early church theology, such as the nature of salvation, the role of knowledge (gnosis), and the relationship between Jesus and his disciples.

The Gospel of Thomas presents distinctive ideas that diverged from mainstream Christian beliefs at the time. For example, it emphasizes individual spiritual discovery and inner knowledge rather than reliance on external authority or institutional structures. This portrayal had implications for how early Christians understood their relationship with God, the concept of salvation, and the nature of discipleship.

Now let’s delve into one aspect that has ignited much discussion: the reactions from church scholars towards the Gospel of Thomas.

Reactions from Church Scholars

The Gospel of Thomas faced varied reactions from church scholars throughout history. Its exclusion from the formal canon raised concerns among early Christian leaders who sought to define orthodox teachings. Some considered it heretical or unorthodox due to its divergent views and its association with certain Gnostic elements. Bishop Eusebius and early church father Origen of Alexandria were among those who expressed apprehension about its contents.

Origen viewed the teachings in the Gospel of Thomas as contradictory to traditional Christian beliefs, suggesting that it was composed by an unauthorized author and did not hold apostolic authority. These early reactions highlight that there was significant debate surrounding which texts should be deemed authoritative sources for doctrinal development within emerging Christianity.

However, despite these reservations, it is important to note that some communities embraced the Gospel of Thomas as a valuable source. For instance, some Gnostic groups found resonance with its teachings and incorporated them into their own theological frameworks.

The reactions from church scholars provide insights into the dynamic landscape of early Christianity and the ongoing process of forming the Christian canon.

Impact on Christian History

The Gospel of Thomas, despite its exclusion from the official Christian canon, has had a significant impact on the history of Christianity. While it is not considered authoritative or divinely inspired like the gospels found in the New Testament, this enigmatic text provides valuable insights into early Christian thought and the diverse theological movements that emerged in the centuries following Jesus’ earthly life.

One of the notable impacts of the Gospel of Thomas is its contribution to our understanding of the formation and development of the Christian canon. By examining this alternative gospel alongside the canonical gospels, scholars have gained a deeper appreciation for the complexity and diversity of early Christian beliefs. The existence and circulation of the Gospel of Thomas raise questions about the criteria used to select certain texts for inclusion in the New Testament while excluding others.

Furthermore, the Gospel of Thomas sheds light on various theological movements that were active during the first few centuries of Christianity. While many ancient Christians would reject it for its different emphasis and portrayal of Jesus, studying this gospel provides valuable insights into early “gnostic” movements that sought to reconcile teachings about Jesus with philosophical principles popular between 100 and 200 AD.

It is essential to understand that not all Christians accepted or adhered to these gnostic ideas presented in the Gospel of Thomas. Rather than representing mainstream Christianity at that time, this text serves as a glimpse into an array of theological perspectives that existed within early Christianity.

Moreover, by examining how ancient Christians rejected and excluded the Gospel of Thomas from their canon, we gain a better understanding of what was deemed orthodox or acceptable within traditional Christian communities. The rejection can be attributed to concerns over doctrinal integrity and a preference for texts that align more closely with the established narratives found in canonical gospels.

Although considered divisive by some, exploring texts like the Gospel of Thomas can broaden our understanding of historical Christianity, challenge our assumptions, and prompt questions about how religious traditions develop and evolve over time. It provides a window into the complexities of early Christian history and offers valuable insights into the diverse religious landscape of the ancient world.

While the Gospel of Thomas may not be recognized as part of the official Christian canon, its impact on Christian history cannot be ignored. Through its preservation and study, we gain deeper insights into the formation of the New Testament canon, early Christian beliefs, and the theological diversity that shaped the evolution of Christianity. Understanding these historical aspects enriches our appreciation for the complexity and development of one of the world’s major religions. The Gospel of Thomas serves as a reminder that there is much to learn from exploring alternative perspectives and voices within religious traditions.